Home > Browse Reports > Diagnostics > Mammography World Markets

Report Description

Mammography World Markets
Publication Date: 01-OCT-08
Pages: 126
Study: TMRMAM
Format/Price: PDF document / $3,400.00
   


Description:



View Sample PDF


The women's mammography segment is poised for a major new phase of growth fueled by the availability of new technology coming out of the computer and digital areas and the higher interest of individual patients and general healthcare consumers to take charge of their own health status. Continuous improvements in technology are resulting in a growing number of new imaging diagnostic tests that combine high levels of accuracy with rapid, easy-to-use product formats. Digital mammography is driving more screening programs. The emphasis in this TriMark Publications report is on those companies and products that are actively developing and marketing clinical laboratory instrumentation and reagents and supplies for performing diagnostic tests on conditions specifically related to women's health. This study concentrates on the mammography market segment in large worldwide markets such as the U.S., Japan and Europe. Certain areas that are not covered include what is generally characterized as digital imaging techniques instruments and reagents, PACS or other data storage methods, or other medical imaging technologies, although many of the instruments, reagents and techniques in the mammography market segment are intimately associated with these broader areas. Specialty areas in medical imaging are touched upon, since these segments are frequently a part of the overall analytical focus of companies marketing general mammography equipment. However, no effort is made to quantify the size of this broader market.





Table of Contents:

  1. 1 Overview 6
  2. 1.1 Statement of Report 6
  3. 1.2 Scope of this Report 6
  4. 1.3 Methodology 7
  5. 1.4 Executive Summary 8
  6. 2 Overview of the Medical Imaging Market 10
  7. 2.1 Medical Imaging Industry Market Size 10
  8. 2.1.1 Global Medical Imaging Market 10
  9. 2.1.2 U.S. Medical Imaging Market 11
  10. 2.2 Medical Imaging Infrastructure 12
  11. 2.2.1 Total Healthcare Expenditures and Demographics 12
  12. 2.2.2 Number of Hospitals 16
  13. 2.2.3 Number of Radiologists 17
  14. 2.2.4 Radiologic Services 18
  15. 2.2.5 Overview of Medical Imaging Market Segments 20
  16. 2.2.6 Market Drivers 20
  17. 2.2.6.1 Product Enhancements Drive Adoption of Imaging Procedures among End Users 20
  18. 2.2.6.2 Potential of Novel Contrast Agents Development to Drive Imaging Procedure Volumes 20
  19. 2.2.6.3 Rapid Pace of Innovation Narrows Product Lifecycles and Restricts Spending 21
  20. 2.2.7 Market Restraints 21
  21. 2.2.8 Market Segments for Medical Imaging 22
  22. 2.2.8.1 Discovery 22
  23. 2.2.8.2 Clinical Applications 22
  24. 2.2.8.3 Clinical Trials 22
  25. 2.2.8.4 Outpatient Facilities Best Growth Market 23
  26. 2.2.8.5 Diagnostic Imaging Modalities Witness Several Technology Advancements 23
  27. 2.2.8.6 Safety and Ergonomics Concerns Drive Technology Growth 23
  28. 2.2.8.7 Volumetric Imaging and Post-image Processing Techniques Develop Rapidly 23
  29. 2.2.8.8 Increasing Implementation of PACS Pushes Digital Radiography into High Gear 24
  30. 2.2.8.9 Future Price Reduction Set to Stimulate Wider Acceptance of DR Systems 24
  31. 2.2.8.10 High-performance Imaging Combined with Lower Radiation Doses Spurs Growth of DR 24
  32. 2.3 Contrast Media 24
  33. 2.3.1 Market Share 25
  34. 2.3.2 Market Drivers 25
  35. 2.4 Picture Archiving Communications Systems 26
  36. 2.4.1 Picture Archiving Communications Systems and Radiology Information Systems 26
  37. 2.4.2 Increasing Digitization of Cardiology-Image Storage and Management Creates Market Growth Opportunities 27
  38. 2.4.3 Enterprise-Wide Integration Is an Important Area for Future Market Development 27
  39. 2.4.4 Competition among Large Companies Intensifies 28
  40. 2.4.5 Benefits of This Service 28
  41. 2.4.6 Market Sectors 28
  42. 2.4.7 Digital Imaging Technology Platforms 28
  43. 2.5 Medical Imaging Companies 29
  44. 2.5.1 A Few Firms Dominate the Industry 30
  45. 2.6 Medical Imaging Industry Forecasts 33
  46. 2.7 Market Niches and Digitalization 35
  47. 2.8 Digital Imaging Techniques 36
  48. 2.8.1 Clinical Uses 36
  49. 2.8.2 Product Enhancements Drive Adoption of Imaging Devices among End-Users 36
  50. 2.8.3 Rapid Pace of Innovation Narrows Product Lifecycles and Restricts Spending 36
  51. 2.8.4 Current and New Digital Imaging Procedures 37
  52. 2.8.5 The Digital Impact on Clinical Imaging Markets 40
  53. 2.8.6 Trends in Digital Imaging 40
  54. 2.8.7 Enhancing Computed Radiography 41
  55. 2.8.8 Digital Radiography vs. Computed Radiography 42
  56. 2.8.9 DR Products 42
  57. 2.8.10 Vasodilator Perfusion Imaging 43
  58. 3 World Mammography Market 45
  59. 3.1 Mammography Overview 45
  60. 3.2 Market Overview 50
  61. 3.2.1 Introduction to Market Overview 50
  62. 3.2.2 World Mammography Markets Revenue 50
  63. 3.2.3 Mammography Markets by Region 51
  64. 3.2.4 Total Market Share 52
  65. 3.2.5 Competitive Structure 52
  66. 3.3 Market Opportunities 53
  67. 3.3.1 Resource Management for Mammography Markets 53
  68. 3.3.2 Movement to Higher Reimbursement Rates 53
  69. 3.3.3 Market Benchmarks for Increased Mammography Utilization 54
  70. 3.4 Market Analysis 54
  71. 3.4.1 Strategic Partnerships 54
  72. 3.4.2 Long Term Trends 54
  73. 3.5 Strategic Outlook 55
  74. 3.5.1 Competitive Elements of Mammography Markets 55
  75. 3.5.2 Higher Reimbursement Rates 55
  76. 3.5.3 Volume Requirements 55
  77. 3.5.4 Product Innovation 55
  78. 3.5.5 Product Leadership 56
  79. 3.5.6 Product Line Strategy 56
  80. 3.5.7 Pricing Strategy and Reimbursement 56
  81. 3.5.8 Strategic Partnerships 57
  82. 3.6 Film-based Mammography Market 59
  83. 3.6.1 Market Overview 59
  84. 3.6.1.1 Unit and Revenue Forecasts 60
  85. 3.6.1.2 Product Analysis 60
  86. 3.6.2 Market Drivers 62
  87. 3.6.3 Market Restraints 62
  88. 3.6.4 Film-based Mammography Market and Technology Trends 63
  89. 3.6.5 U.S. Market for Film-based Screening Systems 63
  90. 3.6.5.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts 64
  91. 3.6.5.2 Competitive Analysis 64
  92. 3.6.5.3 U.S. Installed Base Analysis 65
  93. 3.6.6 European Market for Film-based Mammography Systems 65
  94. 3.6.6.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts 65
  95. 3.6.6.2 Competitive Analysis 66
  96. 3.6.6.3 Installed Base Analysis 66
  97. 3.6.7 Japanese (Pacific Rim) Market for Film-based Mammography Systems 67
  98. 3.6.7.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts 67
  99. 3.6.7.2 Competitive Analysis 67
  100. 3.6.7.3 Installed Base Analysis 68
  101. 3.6.8 Rest of the World Market for Analog Screening Systems 69
  102. 3.6.8.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts 69
  103. 3.6.8.2 Installed Base Analysis 69
  104. 3.7 Digital X-ray Mammography Market 70
  105. 3.7.1 Digital Mammography Overview 70
  106. 3.7.2 Market Overview 71
  107. 3.7.3 Product Background 72
  108. 3.7.4 Product Description 73
  109. 3.7.5 Market Drivers 78
  110. 3.7.6 Market Restraints 79
  111. 3.7.7 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts 81
  112. 3.7.8 Percentage Breakdown of Revenues by Region 83
  113. 3.7.9 Market Share 84
  114. 3.7.10 U.S. Market for Digital Mammography Systems 84
  115. 3.7.10.1 Unit Sales 84
  116. 3.7.10.2 Competitive Analysis 85
  117. 3.7.10.3 U.S. Installed Base Analysis 86
  118. 3.7.11 European Market for Digital Mammography Systems 86
  119. 3.7.11.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts 86
  120. 3.7.11.2 Competitive Analysis 87
  121. 3.7.11.3 Installed Base Analysis 88
  122. 3.7.12 Japanese (Pacific Rim) Market for Digital Mammography Systems 88
  123. 3.7.12.1 Unit Shipment and Revenue Forecasts 88
  124. 3.7.12.2 Competitive Analysis 88
  125. 3.7.12.3 Installed Base Analysis 89
  126. 4 Mammography: Growth Regulators 90
  127. 4.1 Moderators of Growth 90
  128. 4.2 Personnel Acceptance 91
  129. 4.3 Key People for Mammography 91
  130. 4.4 Key Elements for Mammography 92
  131. 4.5 Satellite Facilities 92
  132. 4.6 Reimbursement for Mammography 92
  133. 5 Business Trends in the Industry 96
  134. 5.1 Sector Consolidation 96
  135. 5.2 Mammographic Testing Growth Trends 96
  136. 5.3 Acquisition, License Agreements, Internal Development and Partnerships 96
  137. 5.4 Product Testing Depth in Mammography 97
  138. 5.5 Government Regulation 97
  139. 5.5.1 U.S. Regulation 97
  140. 5.5.1.1 Importing Medical Devices into the U.S. 99
  141. 5.5.1.2 Exporting Medical Devices from the U.S. 100
  142. 5.5.2 U.K. Regulation 100
  143. 5.5.3 E.U. Regulation 101
  144. 5.5.4 Japanese Regulation 103
  145. 5.6 Increased Market Penetration 103
  146. 6 Important Technology Trends 104
  147. 6.1 Stereoscopic Digital Mammography (SDM) 104
  148. 6.2 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 104
  149. 6.3 Mammography Trends 104
  150. 6.4 Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) 106
  151. 6.5 Laser Image Development 108
  152. 7 Company Profiles 109
  153. 7.1 Agfa-Gevaert Corporation 109
  154. 7.2 Carestream Health 109
  155. 7.3 CMT Medical Systems 110
  156. 7.4 Fischer Imaging (Acquired by Hologic) 110
  157. 7.5 FujiFilm Medical Systems 110
  158. 7.6 General Electric Healthcare 111
  159. 7.7 Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. 112
  160. 7.8 Hologic Inc. 112
  161. 7.9 iCAD, Inc. 114
  162. 7.10 Imaging Diagnostic Systems Inc. 115
  163. 7.11 Philips Medical Systems 115
  164. 7.12 R2 Technology, Inc (Acquired by Hologic) 115
  165. 7.13 Scanis Inc. 116
  166. 7.14 Sectra Imtec AB 116
  167. 7.15 Siemens Healthcare 116
  168. 7.16 Toshiba America Medical Systems 117
  169. 7.17 Vidar Systems Corp. 117
  170. 8 Appendices 118
  171. 8.1 Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) 118
  172. 8.2 Sources of National Cancer Institute Information 118
  173. 8.3 Screening Mammograms: Questions and Answers 119
  174. 8.4 FDA Rule: State Certification of Mammography Facilities 124
  175. INDEX OF FIGURES
  176. Figure 2.1: Worldwide Annual Percent Increase in Imaging Market Size, 2002-2012 11
  177. Figure 2.2: U.S. Annual Percent Increase in Imaging Market Size, 2002-2012 12
  178. Figure 2.3: Total Spending on Healthcare in the U.S., 1960-2007 13
  179. Figure 2.4: International Per Capita Healthcare Spending by Country, 2006 13
  180. Figure 2.5: Number Uninsured and Uninsured Rate in the U.S., 1987-2006 15
  181. Figure 2.6: Global Market Share of Contrast Media Markets, 2006 25
  182. Figure 2.7: Worldwide Market Share of Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Companies, 2006 30
  183. Figure 3.1: Worldwide Market for Mammography Systems by Region, 2007 52
  184. Figure 3.2: Worldwide Market for Digital Mammography Systems by Region, 2007 83
  185. INDEX OF TABLES
  186. Table 2.1: Global Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001-2012 10
  187. Table 2.2: U.S. Medical Imaging Market Size, 2001-2012 11
  188. Table 2.3: U.S. User Expenditures for Medical Imaging Equipment and Related Products, 2000-2007 14
  189. Table 2.4: Millions of Americans Over 65 Years of Age, 2000-2050 14
  190. Table 2.5: Insured and Uninsured Breakdown in the U.S., 2001-2005 15
  191. Table 2.6: Percentage of Population Without Health Insurance in the U.S., 2007 16
  192. Table 2.7: Total Number of U.S. Hospitals, 2007 16
  193. Table 2.8: U.S. Radiological Images Taken, 1999-2010 19
  194. Table 2.9: Global Market Share of Contrast Media Markets, 2006 25
  195. Table 2.10: Worldwide Market Share of Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Companies, 2006 29
  196. Table 2.11: Worldwide Imaging Procedures, 2001 to 2012 34
  197. Table 3.1: U.S. Use of Mammography in Women Over 40, 1987-2005 46
  198. Table 3.2: Annual Mammography Procedures in the U.S., 2000-2008 46
  199. Table 3.3: Annual Mammography Procedures in Europe, 2002-2007 47
  200. Table 3.4: Annual Mammography Procedures in Japan, 2002-2007 47
  201. Table 3.5: Annual Mammography Procedures in the Rest of the World, 2002-2007 47
  202. Table 3.6: Mammography Facts (U.S.), 2005 48
  203. Table 3.7: Breast Cancer Survival Rates by Country 49
  204. Table 3.8: Surgical Biopsies Performed in the U.S., 2000-2007 49
  205. Table 3.9: The Worldwide Mammography Instrument Market, 2000-2010 51
  206. Table 3.10: Worldwide Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010 52
  207. Table 3.11: Worldwide Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010 60
  208. Table 3.12: Worldwide Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010 60
  209. Table 3.13: Worldwide Mammography Film-based Instrument Market by Region, 2000-2010 63
  210. Table 3.14: U.S. Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010 64
  211. Table 3.15: U.S. Mammography Film-based Instrument Market Manufacturer Share, 2007 64
  212. Table 3.16: U.S. Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010 65
  213. Table 3.17: European Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010 65
  214. Table 3.18: European Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010 66
  215. Table 3.19: European Mammography Film-based Instrument Market Manufacturer Share, 2007 66
  216. Table 3.20: Japanese Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010 67
  217. Table 3.21: Japanese Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010 68
  218. Table 3.22: Japanese Mammography Film-based Instrument Market Manufacturer Share 68
  219. Table 3.23: ROW Mammography Film-based Instrument Market, 2000-2010 69
  220. Table 3.24: ROW Film-based Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010 69
  221. Table 3.25: Advantages of Digital Mammography 72
  222. Table 3.26: Worldwide Digital General Radiography Market, 2000-2012 82
  223. Table 3.27: Worldwide Market for Digital Mammography Systems Annual Unit Sales 2000-2010 82
  224. Table 3.28: Worldwide Market for Digital Mammography Systems Dollar Volume 2000-2010 83
  225. Table 3.29: Worldwide Mammography Digital Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010 83
  226. Table 3.30: Worldwide Mammography Digital Instrument Market by Region, 2000-2010 84
  227. Table 3.31: Share of Worldwide Market for Digital Mammography Systems by Competitor, 2007 84
  228. Table 3.32: U.S. Mammography Digital Instrument Market, 2001-2010 85
  229. Table 3.33: U.S. Digital Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010 86
  230. Table 3.34: European Mammography Digital Instrument Market, 2001-2010 86
  231. Table 3.35: European Digital Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010 88
  232. Table 3.36: Japanese Mammography Digital Instrument Market, 2001-2010 88
  233. Table 3.37: Japanese Digital Mammography Instrumentation Placements, 2002-2010 89
  234. Table 4.1: Medicare Reimbursement for Mammography Services, 2007 95
  235. Table 6.1: CAD Mammography Systems 108

Registration
Browse Reports
Search TriMark
Reading Room
My Account
View Cart
Home  |  Reports  |  Database Tables  |  Conferences  |  Contact Us  
     © 2008 TriMark Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.    Powered by Manta