Home > Browse Reports > Diagnostics > Companion Diagnostics in Personalized Medicine and Cancer Therapy

Report Description

Companion Diagnostics in Personalized Medicine and Cancer Therapy
Publication Date: 01-APR-08
Pages: 190
Study: TMRCDPM
Format/Price: PDF document / $3,400.00
   


Description:



View Sample PDF


A near-term market opportunity for cancer companion diagnostic tests exists in drug selection for cancer therapy. Co-development of molecular diagnostics and targeted therapeutics has already been proven to be a successful strategy in the development of novel anti-cancer drugs. Adoption of biomarker development in clinical research provides great opportunities to identify patient subpopulations with differential drug responses and to uncover the underlying mechanisms. These data could help to explain if clinical trials of new drugs are adequate, and offer the possibility of creating a clear prescription path based on predictive biomarkers. The purpose of this TriMark Publications report is to describe the specific segment of the diagnostics market that develops new technology platforms for evaluating the metabolism of therapeutic agents, or for evaluating which therapeutic regimes are most effective for a particular type of disease. The term companion diagnostic means that the particular diagnostic test under evaluation is specifically linked to a known therapeutic drug. This linkage could be important in the therapeutic application and clinical outcome of a drug (personalized medicine), or an important component of the drug development process. This report focuses on the former linkage, i.e., the use of companion diagnostic tests in personalized medicine.





Table of Contents:

  1. 1 Overview 6
  2. 1.1 Statement of Report 6
  3. 1.2 About This Report 6
  4. 1.3 Scope of the Report 6
  5. 1.4 Objectives 7
  6. 1.5 Methodology 8
  7. 1.6 Executive Summary 9
  8. 2 Companion Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine 13
  9. 2.1 Scope of this Section 13
  10. 2.2 Introduction to Companion Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine 13
  11. 2.3 Drug Metabolism and Companion Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine 17
  12. 2.4 Examples of Personalized Medicine and Companion Diagnostic Tests 21
  13. 2.5 Personalized Medicine and Companion Diagnostic Testing Product Pipeline 24
  14. 2.6 The Personalized Medicine Coalition (PMC) 26
  15. 2.7 Regulatory Trends and Guidelines in the Personalized Medicine Space 29
  16. 2.7.1 The Changing Regulatory Landscape for Personalized Medicine 31
  17. 2.8 Companion Diagnostics Play an Increasing Role in Cancer Care 32
  18. 2.9 Specific Examples of Clinical Situations Where Companion Diagnostics Are Being Deployed 33
  19. 2.9.1 Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Assay 33
  20. 2.9.2 Individualized Warfarin Therapy 35
  21. 2.9.3 UGT1A1 Molecular Assay for Camptosar 36
  22. 2.9.4 Response to Gleevec in GIST 36
  23. 2.9.5 LabCorp, ARCA Personalized Medicine Deal for Cardiovascular Diseases 36
  24. 2.9.6 Osmetech Licenses Epidauros Biotechnologie AG CYP2D6 Biomarker to Enter Companion Diagnostics 36
  25. 2.10 Diagnostic Tests for Personalized Analysis of Cancer Therapy Effectiveness 37
  26. 3 Companion Diagnostics: Qualitative and Quantitative Market Analysis 38
  27. 3.1 Market Analysis of Molecular Diagnostics and Companion Diagnostics 38
  28. 3.2 Costs of Companion Diagnostics in Healthcare Expenditures 39
  29. 3.3 Molecular Diagnostic Market 40
  30. 3.4 Molecular Diagnostics Technology Platforms and Their Impact on Clinical Medicine 42
  31. 3.5 Snapshot of Companion Diagnostics Industry Structure 44
  32. 3.6 The Case for Theranostics 45
  33. 3.7 Companion Diagnostics Market Analysis-Market Survey Data Characterizing the Qualitative and Quantitative Industry Parameters 46
  34. 4 Trends and Overview 49
  35. 4.1 Companion Diagnostics: Industry SWOT Analysis 49
  36. 4.2 Macro Trends in Companion Diagnostics 49
  37. 4.3 Challenges for Companion Diagnostics Development 52
  38. 4.4 Timeline for Impact of Various Segments in Companion Diagnostics 53
  39. 4.5 Use of Proteomics to Develop Individualized Tests 55
  40. 4.6 The Market Problem: Finding Value with Diagnostics for Personalized Medicine 56
  41. 5 Biomarker Tests Co-developed with Cancer Therapeutics as Companion Diagnostics 57
  42. 5.1 Sector Overview 57
  43. 5.1.1 Impact of New Technology Platforms 57
  44. 5.1.2 Impact on Drug Discovery 58
  45. 5.1.3 Biomarkers as Endpoints in Drug Discovery 58
  46. 5.1.4 Targeted Therapy 59
  47. 5.2 Companion Diagnostics on the Market 60
  48. 5.3 Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Companions 60
  49. 5.3.1 Bevacizamab (Avastin) 61
  50. 5.3.2 EGFR for Colorectal Cancer and Camptosar (Irinotecan) 62
  51. 5.3.3 EGFR Express and Erbitux (Cetuximab) 62
  52. 5.3.4 HER2 and Heceptin (Trastuzumab) 63
  53. 5.3.5 Iressa and Tarceva Companion Test 65
  54. 5.3.6 Tykerb (GSK), and Vectibix™ (Amgen) Companion Tests 65
  55. 5.3.7 EGFRx Assay 66
  56. 5.3.8 Monogram eTag 67
  57. 5.3.9 Veripath OncoDiagnostics EGFR PharmDX 67
  58. 5.4 Myriad's TheraGuide 5-FU 67
  59. 5.5 Companions for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Erlotinib and Gefitinib 68
  60. 5.5.1 TheraScreen: EGFR29 68
  61. 5.5.2 The K-RAS Mutation Detection Kit 68
  62. 5.6 Irinotecan and UGT1A1 68
  63. 5.7 Gleevec (Imatinib) Companions 68
  64. 5.7.1 DakoCytomation's c-Kit (9.7) pharmDx 69
  65. 5.8 Companion Diagnostics Involving Metabolizing Enzymes 69
  66. 5.8.1 Companions for TMPT, CYP2C9, and UGT1A1 Enzymes 69
  67. 5.8.2 Companions for Aromatase Inhibitors 70
  68. 5.8.3 Companions for Actos and Avandia 70
  69. 5.9 Drivers and Barriers to Companion Diagnostics 71
  70. 5.10 Partnerships with Pharma Companies to Identify Therapeutic Targets 71
  71. 5.11 Circulating Tumor Cell Assay: Prognostic and Predictive Factors for Breast Cancer 72
  72. 5.12 Companion Diagnostics Used by Clinical Service Laboratories 72
  73. 5.13 New Technologies and Products under Development 73
  74. 5.13.1 OncoMethylome 73
  75. 5.14 Blood-Based Technologies 75
  76. 5.14.1 Oncotech 75
  77. 5.15 Monogram Biosciences HIV Personalized Platform 76
  78. 5.16 Wako LBA\AFP Test for Liver Cancer 76
  79. 5.17 Future Developments for Companion Diagnostics 76
  80. 6 Business and Regulatory Trends in the Companion Biomarker Testing Sector 78
  81. 6.1 Industry Consolidation 78
  82. 6.2 Breath of Product Offering and Pricing 79
  83. 6.3 Government Regulation of Medical Devices 79
  84. 6.3.1 FDA Guidance on Drug Test Co-development 81
  85. 6.3.2 Device Classes 81
  86. 6.3.3 Investigational Use of IVDM Assays 81
  87. 6.3.4 Post-market Requirements 82
  88. 6.4 Strategic Business and Marketing Considerations 83
  89. 6.5 Commercial Opportunities in Companion Markers 84
  90. 6.6 Moderators of Growth 85
  91. 6.6.1 Roadblocks to Integrating Companion Biomarkers into Clinical Practice 85
  92. 6.6.2 Management of Targeted Therapeutics by Third-Party Payers 86
  93. 6.7 Biotechnology Industry Trends 86
  94. 6.8 Pharmaceutical Industry Trends 86
  95. 6.9 Acquisition, License Agreement, Partnerships 87
  96. 6.10 Legal Developments 90
  97. 6.11 Sales and Marketing Strategies for Tumor Marker Tests 91
  98. 6.11.1 International Markets 93
  99. 6.12 Product Commercialization 94
  100. 6.13 Reimbursement 95
  101. 6.14 Self-Referral Rules 96
  102. 6.15 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 97
  103. 6.16 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) 98
  104. 6.17 In Vitro Diagnostic Directive (IVDD) and Medical Device Regulations 98
  105. 6.18 FDA's Quality System Regulation (QSR) 99
  106. 6.19 FDA'S OIVD on IVDMIAs 99
  107. 6.20 FDA's Qualification of Cancer Biomarkers 100
  108. 6.20.1 Regulatory Perspectives of Biomarker Validation 100
  109. 6.21 Genetic Tests and Medical Records 101
  110. 6.21.1 Laws against Genetic Discrimination 102
  111. 6.22 Medicare Reimbursement 102
  112. 6.22.1 Medicare Part B Spending Trends 102
  113. 6.23 Global Drivers of Clinical Laboratory Testing 104
  114. 6.24 Global Outlook 105
  115. 6.25 Oncology Biomarker Qualification Initiative 106
  116. 6.26 FDA Critical Path 107
  117. 6.27 Biomarkers and FDA's Voluntary Genomic Data Submission 107
  118. 6.28 From Personalized to Predictive Medicine 107
  119. 6.29 Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness at the Individual Level 107
  120. 6.30 The Patient and Advocate Perspective: An Evolution of Influence 107
  121. 6.31 Real-World Experiences Translating the Vision of Personalized Medicine into Practice 107
  122. 7 Companies Entering the Companion Diagnostics Market 109
  123. 7.1 Industry Overview 109
  124. 7.2 Representative Companion Diagnostic Development Companies 109
  125. 7.2.1 20/20 GeneSystems 111
  126. 7.2.2 Abbott Diagnostics 111
  127. 7.2.3 Affymetrix 114
  128. 7.2.4 Agendia BV 116
  129. 7.2.5 Agensys 117
  130. 7.2.6 Almac Group 117
  131. 7.2.7 AMDL 117
  132. 7.2.8 Arcturus Bioscience (acquired by Molecular Devices) 119
  133. 7.2.9 Aureon Laboratories 119
  134. 7.2.10 BD 120
  135. 7.2.11 Beckman Coulter 120
  136. 7.2.12 Biocode Hycel 122
  137. 7.2.13 BioCurex 122
  138. 7.2.14 Biomarker Technologies 123
  139. 7.2.15 Biomedical Diagnostics 123
  140. 7.2.16 Biomerica 123
  141. 7.2.17 bioMérieux 124
  142. 7.2.18 BioModa 124
  143. 7.2.19 Bruker Daltonics 125
  144. 7.2.20 Cangen Biotechnologies 125
  145. 7.2.21 Caprion Proteomics 126
  146. 7.2.22 Celera Diagnostics 126
  147. 7.2.23 Cepheid 128
  148. 7.2.24 Claros Diagnostics 128
  149. 7.2.25 Clinical Data: PGxHealth and Cogenics 129
  150. 7.2.26 Ciphergen Biosystems renamed Vermillion, Inc. 131
  151. 7.2.27 Clarient 133
  152. 7.2.28 Correlogic Systems 134
  153. 7.2.29 CytoCore 134
  154. 7.2.30 Cytogen 134
  155. 7.2.31 Cytyc Corporation 138
  156. 7.2.32 Dako (formerly DakoCytomation) 138
  157. 7.2.33 DiaDexus 139
  158. 7.2.34 Digene (acquired by Qiagen) 140
  159. 7.2.35 DiagnoCure 140
  160. 7.2.36 Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (acquired by Beckman Coulter) 141
  161. 7.2.37 DRG International 142
  162. 7.2.38 DxS 143
  163. 7.2.39 EDP Biotech 144
  164. 7.2.40 Epigenomics 144
  165. 7.2.41 EXACT Sciences Corporation 145
  166. 7.2.42 Exagen Diagnostics 146
  167. 7.2.43 Gene Logic 147
  168. 7.2.44 Genesis Genomics 148
  169. 7.2.45 Genomic Health 148
  170. 7.2.46 Gen-Probe 149
  171. 7.2.47 Health Discovery Corporation 149
  172. 7.2.48 Ikonisys 150
  173. 7.2.49 Immunicon 150
  174. 7.2.50 Immunomedics 154
  175. 7.2.51 Incyte 155
  176. 7.2.52 InterGenetics 155
  177. 7.2.53 Ipsogen 156
  178. 7.2.54 LabCorp 156
  179. 7.2.55 Matritech 157
  180. 7.2.56 Miraculins 160
  181. 7.2.57 Mitsubishi Kagaku latron 160
  182. 7.2.58 Monogram Biosciences 160
  183. 7.2.59 Myriad Genetics 161
  184. 7.2.60 NimbleGen Systems 164
  185. 7.2.61 Northwest Biotherapeutics 164
  186. 7.2.62 Nycomed 166
  187. 7.2.63 Oncotech 166
  188. 7.2.64 Oncothyreon (formerly known as Biomira) 167
  189. 7.2.65 Orion Genomics 168
  190. 7.2.66 Oxford Genome Sciences 168
  191. 7.2.67 Panacea Pharmaceuticals 169
  192. 7.2.68 Perlegen Sciences 169
  193. 7.2.69 Polymedco 169
  194. 7.2.70 Power3 Medical Products 170
  195. 7.2.71 Prometheus 170
  196. 7.2.72 Proteome Systems 171
  197. 7.2.73 Qiagen 171
  198. 7.2.74 Sanko Junyaku 172
  199. 7.2.75 SensiGen 172
  200. 7.2.76 SuperArray Bioscience 172
  201. 7.2.77 Third Wave Technologies 173
  202. 7.2.78 Tosoh Biosciences 173
  203. 7.2.79 TrimGen 173
  204. 7.2.80 TriPath Imaging (acquired by BD) 174
  205. 7.2.81 Upstream Biosciences 174
  206. 7.2.82 Ventana Medical Systems 174
  207. 7.2.83 Veridex 176
  208. Appendix 1: FDA Guidance for Industry: Pharmacogenomic Data Submission (March 2005) 177
  209. Appendix 2: Histochemical Markers for Cancer 189
  210. LIST OF TABLES
  211. Table 2.1: Timeline for Development of Companion Diagnostics 14
  212. Table 2.2: Personalized Medicine at the Nexus Point 15
  213. Table 2.3: Percentage of Non-Responders in Various Drug Classes 16
  214. Table 2.4: High-Profile Drug Withdrawals from the Marketplace 16
  215. Table 2.5: Metabolism of Drugs by Hepatic Enzymes 18
  216. Table 2.6: Drug Metabolism Drives Drug Efficacy/Toxicity 21
  217. Table 2.7: Population Frequency of the Various Cytochromes 21
  218. Table 2.8: Selected List of Personalized Medicine Tests 23
  219. Table 2.9: Personalized Medicine Product Pipeline 25
  220. Table 2.10: Marketed Personalized Therapies in 2006 26
  221. Table 2.11: Typical Response Rates in Therapeutic Areas 33
  222. Table 2.12: Prevalence of People Taking Medications Metabolized by Liver Enzymes 34
  223. Table 2.13: UGT1A1 Helps to Determine Risks Associated with Irinotecan 34
  224. Table 2.14: Current Product Labels: Enzyme Metabolism 35
  225. Table 3.1: Timeline for Impact of Various Molecular Diagnostics Technologies on Personalized Medicine 43
  226. Table 3.2: Impact of Molecular Diagnostics Technologies on Therapeutic Areas in Personalized Medicine 43
  227. Table 3.3: Challenges of Various Molecular Diagnostics Technology Platforms in Personalized Medicine 44
  228. Table 3.4: FDA Classification of Diagnostics by Risk 46
  229. Table 4.1: Personalized Medicine Industry SWOT Analysis 49
  230. Table 4.2: Market Opportunities in Personalized Medicine 51
  231. Table 4.3: Challenges for Market Adoption of Various Personalized Medicine Tests 52
  232. Table 4.4: Hurdles to Personalized Medicine and Companion Diagnostics Development 53
  233. Table 4.5: Timeline of Impact in Areas of Personalized Medicine 54
  234. Table 4.6: Impact of Personalized Medicine on Various Therapeutic Areas 55
  235. Table 5.1: Potential Benefits of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostics 59
  236. Table 5.2: Utility of Biomarker as Companion Diagnostics to Drug Development 59
  237. Table 5.3: ASCO-CAP Guidelines for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: How to Interpret Test Results 63
  238. Table 5.4: Device Submission Elements for the FDA 71
  239. Table 6.1: List and Discounted Prices for Abbott Tumor Marker Tests 79
  240. Table 6.2: Medicare Spending on Clinical Lab Services, 1996 to 2005 103
  241. Table 6.3: Hospital Laboratory Share of Part B Medicare Spending, 1996 to 2005 104
  242. Table 6.4: Medicare Part B Lab Spending Per Medicare Enrollee, 1998 to 2005 104
  243. Table 6.5: Summary of Biomarker Use in the Commercialization of Novel Oncology Pharmacotherapeutics 108
  244. Table 6.6: Pharmacoeconomic Challenges to the Implementation of Biomarkers as Companion Diagnostic Tests 108
  245. Table 7.1: Major Players in Companion Diagnostic Sector 109
  246. Table 7.2: Tumor Diagnosis Immunoassay 142
  247. Table 7.3: Tumor Diagnosis Radioimmunoassay 143
  248. Table 7.4: Summary of Matritech's Product Development Programs 159
  249. LIST OF FIGURES
  250. Figure 2.1: Personalizing Drug Treatment 13
  251. Figure 2.2: Approaches to Personalized Medicine 14
  252. Figure 2.3: The Phase I and II Processes of Drug Metabolism 17
  253. Figure 2.4: Hepatic Distribution of Human CYP450 18
  254. Figure 2.5: Relative Contribution of CYP450 Enzymes to Drug Metabolism 19
  255. Figure 2.6: Genetic Components Determine Drug Metabolism 19
  256. Figure 2.7: Personalized Medicine Drugs in Development 24
  257. Figure 3.1: From Genetic Content to Personalized Medicine 39
  258. Figure 3.2: Impact of Diagnostic Testing on Healthcare Decision Making 39
  259. Figure 3.3: Impact of Diagnostic Testing on Healthcare Spending 40
  260. Figure 3.4: Breakout of the Molecular Diagnostics Marketplace by Country 40
  261. Figure 3.5: Breakout of the Molecular Diagnostics Marketplace by Vendor 41
  262. Figure 3.6: Molecular Diagnostics Market Segmentation 42
  263. Figure 3.7: Molecular Diagnostics Market Segmentation by Technology 42
  264. Figure 3.8: Market Survey Respondent Demographics 46
  265. Figure 3.9: Breakout of the Respondent Pool by Affiliation 47
  266. Figure 3.10: Segmentation of the Personalized Medicine Market 47
  267. Figure 4.1: Personalized Medicine Market Drivers 50
  268. Figure 4.2: Challenges in the Personalized Medicine Space 50
  269. Figure 5.1: Carcinogenesis Is a Multi-Step Process 57
  270. Figure 5.2: ASCO-CAP Guidelines for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Equivocal Results with IHC 64
  271. Figure 5.3: ASCO-CAP Guidelines for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Results by FISH 64
  272. Figure 5.4: MGMT Methylation Status Correlates to Survival Rate 74
  273. Figure 6.1: Part B Spending on Clinical Lab Services, 1991 to 2005 103

Registration
Browse Reports
Search TriMark
Reading Room
My Account
View Cart
Home  |  Reports  |  Database Tables  |  Conferences  |  Contact Us  
     © 2008 TriMark Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.